Most people, moralize others, visually.
Because, most folks have been traumatized to do so, since childhood.
For most people, in most contexts, about anything, people discover, analyze, dissect, evaluate, and MORALIZE other people, visually.
In that context, here’s a tiny glimpse into my life, starting with my top tier “ not for children, mature, sophisticated adult level audience parameter of artistic & functional moving bodywork content “. Moralize me all you want, LOL.
Especially for men, we are infinitely ridiculed, and most of all demonized morally, if ever we wear super tight [especially ballet like core body attire], shiny clothing.
As a long time self taught classicl ballet & burlesque choreagrapher & lead dancer in the Montreal area elite underground world, I know exactly why.
The Overton window of NON acceptability is dynamically maintained, regarding bringing up & away men’s genitalia from between men’s legs, EVEN often times, for optimal biological safety, like in real ballet, & MMA.
In large & summary, the silent, intuitive, unspoken, shaming & humiliating narative, about what supposedly real manly, masculine, conservative, traditional and most of all “moral” men, OUGHT to wear, for bottom attire, is never to be tight, and shiny, less one is persecuted & crusified as NOT heterosexual, and therefore less worthy of respect, adnauseum….
Ah, but what is the actual why?
First, because of general Feminism’s infinite pschological conditioning & programming of boys, to make them behave exactly as fembot wimps prefer.
But, still, why?
Bullet point one:
To discentivize boys and men, to learn well enough their 5Ws, of their biological bodies. That means the what, when, where, why, who, and I add the “how”, of our bodies’s biological inquiring.
Bullet point two:
To make constant isolation of men’s mind from their bodies, so to control, shame, ridicule, and punish boys and men, for expressing any and all even remotely benevolent sexually related & visually appealing behavior, where women do NOT have complete moralizing control contexts. That includes, when women are menstruating, or not periods.
Bullet 3:
To maintain feminist women’s control of men’s sexual arousing powers.
Case in point, “straight”, traditional, strip joints, bars, & clubs, where the “girls”{the’re not fking girls but women BTW, or at least ought not to be so}, have the literal power OVER the mainly male audience. But, it’s mostly the opposite in “for women only Chippendales” type strip joints.
4:
Fourth and most of all, to brand men into two as distinct as possible, sexual orientation classes, for easier control.
Case in point: It’s much easier to persuade publicly outed homosexual men, to comply to women’s infinite non reality based desires, than uber masculine, benevolently aggresive men.
The most common & fail safe, IMHO, specific way, women decide whether a man is crooked or straight, is to what extent a man wears or not, tight & shiny groin/core body area attire.
There’s many additional bullet points I could add to this post, but I digress, for now.
If you made it this far, you obviously ought to know by now, I, for many years, give a permanent royal fk you finger, to all who denigrate my choice of attire, while doing certain quick moving bodywork movements.
And yes, all that being said, since boyhood, I’m acutely aware that I’m part of the 1% of the 1% of rare men, who are completely outside of the Overton window of socially and politically acceptable behavior. Because of mostly the advent of computer/internet revolutions, I don’t need to give a flying fk about anyone’s moralizing. LOL.